L/R 110 4x4 Regional Force Surveilance Vehicle (RFSV)

[digger]

The CAD drawings are copyright.

But you can buy new, these prices are excluding delivery ( Direct from the manufacture )

OR FOR ABOUT $1000 MORE GET THE WHOLE VEHICLE WITH THEM FITTED AND INTERIOR BOXES AND PIONEER TOOLS ETC ETC..
http://www.graysonline.com/lot/0002-8001390/transport-trucks-and-trailers/land-rover-110-4x4-regional-force-surveillance-soft-top-rfsv-05-1991

11711 KMS ON SPEEDO!!    ONLY 4 DAYS LEFT...

OR THIS ONE  ABOUT A GRAND MORE AT THE MOMENT

http://www.graysonline.com/lot/0003-8001390/transport-trucks-and-trailers/land-rover-110-4x4-regional-force-surveillance-soft-top-rfsv-07-1991

101,000KM   ALSO HAS ALL THE BITS....  NOTE THE HEAVY DUTY RIMS
 INCLUDING SPARES

[juddy]

If that goes for a 1000 $ more then the side bins some one will have the bargain of the year. More Like 15/20K

[FFRMAN]

If that goes for a 1000 $ more then the side bins some one will have the bargain of the year. More Like 15/20K

15 - 20k has been the mark lately, maybe with 12 up for sale more 15 than 20k this time.

Will be interesting to see.

[FFRMAN]

speaking of wa RFSV's, my old girl.

Thanks for sharing the photo, what is the ARN 51

thanks Scott

[Welby]

She is 51 619 and her patrol sister was 51 628



i see on your register of ARN's you have 51 744. You can write her off.

[THE BOOGER]

774 looks like it was nasty hope they were not hurt to bad

[Welby]

makes a mockery of the term Roll Over Protection.

[aussiegregmac]

Damn, just the right hand storage box I'm seeking a replacement for.
Looks a bit cactus too.
Greg Mac.

[dugite]

makes a mockery of the term Roll Over Protection.

on the contrary -

ROPS Roll over protection

it's for protection welby - which it apparently gave to the extent that the system was able to

[Welby]

No, i meant what i said.

Roll over protection it is not. And never has been.
Its a piece of pipe to hold up the canopy, cam net rack and boat support brackets. The rear hoop itself has no structural integrity at all.

Any one who has had experience in motorsport ROPs and engineered ROPs for mining use would laugh at it. I'd be keen to learn if the original design was meant to be ROPs and if it complied to AS of the day.

As it is i'll be happy to agree to disagree.

[Sixty]

the rear canopy bow is exactly that, it was never part of the 'ROPS'.

And looking at the pic the ROPS did its job of protecting the occupants 

[Young Eric]

i see on your register of ARN's you have 51 744. You can write her off

Has 51 744 come thru the auctions yet ?

[digger]

She is 51 619 and her patrol sister was 51 628



i see on your register of ARN's you have 51 744. You can write her off.

I note, one painted arches, one not...

[kman]

Seems to have worked but I always wondered at ROPS that depends on the body for support. Would have thought going down to the chassis should be required?

Howard
[/quote]

on the contrary -

ROPS Roll over protection

it's for protection welby - which it apparently gave to the extent that the system was able to

it's not intended to stop it rolling over which you appear to have thought it meant 
[/quote]

[Carzee]

Near the front passenger 'kneespace', fitted to the plastic surface of the lower dash area, is a sort of flexible 2.5 inch long metal protrusion, a tap or hose connector of some kind. Just pokes out. I didn't have more than a few seconds in there and so I ask the RFSV brainstrust - What is it?