Hooray! I’m finally regaining the sight in my right eye. It’s been a long long time, too long, but it’s slowly settling down.
Just the fact that I can see better, albeit marginally, improves my attitude and motivation level.
Noticed something odd this morning while flicking through my subscriptions on Youtube, where “seriously series” put up a new video and the series 3 they used to highlight the video, well it just looked odd.
I mean, it looks straight and neat front on, impressive if you ask me, with a similar profile to my 109 I think, but there was something about it that just seemed foreign, and this caused me to flick back through pictures of my 109 as well as myriad pictures of series 3 vehicles via Google in order to suss out what was the standard layout for the parking light and blinker on a series 3.
I vaguely recall trying to figure this out when I rebuilt the 109 all those years ago, but from memory I think I just settled on copying what the majority of people had, which was parker up top and blinker down below, so after seeing the “seriously series” picture, where the blinker is up top, it got me searching online again this morning to suss out what was what.
I’m sure the placement of the indicators and parkers were covered by an ADR rule but I just can’t be bothered trying to find that, so I decided I’d try to figure it out by looking at multiple images of series 3 Land Rovers online, and try to see what was standard that way.
Most show the blinker on the bottom, which is how mine is, and from memory I think I somehow determined that to be the standard.
It’s strange to flick through hundreds of images looking at just the indicators and parking light positions, because every now and then you see the placement has been reversed and it kind of catches you off guard.
I’m not entirely sure but I think the ADR relating to indicators and lights on a series 3 mightn’t apply to an ex army vehicle as they had a number of exemptions from new.
I still love the fact that my 109 has the 27a exemption, which few people know about, and was indeed news to me when I purchased the vehicle, but during the rebuild when I was doing the research on what I could and couldn’t get away with, I discovered the missing 27a on the compliance plate and that sent me off in many different directions, looking for the “why”.
Tool holders bolted to the front panels are another one. I cringe whenever I see a non military Land Rover with tool holders bolted onto them and I wonder how shocked those people will be if ever a savvy lawman wheels them over.
Who uses their tool holders, really?
They’re shocking bits of gear if ever you need to lean up and over into the engine bay, for they’ll gouge you in a number of ways. My ribs hurt just reflecting on the number of times I copped it when working on mine, or what about the little split pins they used to have in them? Anyone who’s worked on an ex army banger will fondly recall being fanged by those blasted split pins. I removed mine and threw them far far away.
I can recall losing the plot over my tool holders while rebuilding the 109 and removed them at some stage and refitted them after all the engine bay work was done. They were the last things to go back on, weeks later, if I remember correctly.
I don’t use my tool holders for anything other than cracking jokes with, stuff like how these are the only vehicles on the road where the potential for some serious road rage is openly on display, in that the weapons are openly carried, so to speak.
You’ve got your pick handle right there, along with the axe, either are just a wing nut away from deployment, and the shovel is on the opposite side just in case you need to plant your victim and the mattock head is there too, in case the digging gets too hard.
I remember going to great lengths to acquire genuine tools for mine but they’re all lost now and I can’t be buggered searching out new ones for they’re a total hassle in that they’re easily stolen and are too expensive to replace.
I suppose the “look” of the ex army series vehicles is what attracts people to them for they do have a tough look about them, and looks are often deceptive.
My childhood dream to own a series 3 army Land Rover were probably driven by how rugged they looked, and as a kid I hadn’t any idea about what made them tick but I liked them and just had to have one.
I’m still at a loss as to how any government could deploy them where bullets are flying and get away with it.
A stark reminder of this can be found if one looks at images of the series 2a vehicles which were ambushed in Vietnam.
Coke cans on wheels...
Those are some haunting images.