Author Topic: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers  (Read 1250 times)

Offline 303Gunner

  • REMLR Inc
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 931
  • THANKS 105
  • Location: Lithgow, NSW
  • REMLR No: 128
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #30 on: September 26, 2017, 10:49:41 PM »
Here's a photo with a spare tyre for you.
...
Caption: 20060528 Perentie Land Rover is off loaded onto the wharf from HMAS Tobruk at Dili Harbour, Timor-Leste, during Operation Astute.
Can we work out from other photos what the ACTUAL arn is, for either the Perentie or PT2-2?

And the PT2-2 trailers were conceived and designed to carry an Advanced Power APD016 16kVa 3Ph diesel genset, as pictured in the Navy pic. Some of these have been sold off through Mannheims if you need to complete your trailer:

Offline Carzee

  • REMLR Committee
  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 2861
  • THANKS 111
  • Perentie FFR 50-257
    • RC's Shed
  • Location: Canberra
  • REMLR No: 007
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #31 on: September 27, 2017, 07:21:51 AM »
Well spotted and great info on the genset.

ARNs...
The trailer on the wharf has a dent on the front edge of the wheel mudguard. Not much to go on. The May 2006 Astute prep or RTA work would be noted in the trailer logbook.

The GMV logbook and cam pattern may identify the 6x6. Someone on the forum such as Sixty could get forensic on this.... perhaps. Not many GMVs were made.

The photo would be a good addition to the GMV page http://www.remlr.com/perentie-gmv.html

Offline Sixty

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 270
  • THANKS 70
  • Location: Wishing I was bush in the Top End....
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #32 on: September 27, 2017, 04:53:08 PM »
W7 could possibly be from 3CSR (previously HQ COY 3BDE circa early 90's- we used W1 - W8 for our callsigns)
RoyalAustralianEasyMoneyEarner!

Al

Offline Carzee

  • REMLR Committee
  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 2861
  • THANKS 111
  • Perentie FFR 50-257
    • RC's Shed
  • Location: Canberra
  • REMLR No: 007
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #33 on: September 28, 2017, 12:24:50 PM »
Thx sixty. So that unit in a logbook and a trip to ET in 2006 would narrow it down the possible ARNs a heck of a lot.

Offline pwillo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • THANKS 0
  • Location: Redcliffe
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #34 on: October 19, 2017, 01:36:48 PM »
Very neat result Diana ...

I moved my handbrake to the front of the RHS frame (needed one cable changed).


I would like to relocate my handbrake also, where did you get the new cable please?

Regards
Series 2A GS bought and sold before the Internet was discovered.
Perentie FFR 51-558
Hallmark PT1-1.2 204923
Discovery for comfort!

Offline dugite

  • REMLR Committee
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 822
  • THANKS 73
  • Location: Tamworth
  • REMLR No: 374
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #35 on: October 19, 2017, 06:10:43 PM »
NEIC, Tamworth

 http://newenglandinstrument.com/

was a few years ago but they probably remember it
2a 109 114-341,
No.5 173-589,
W/S Platform 178-000,
PT1 204-796

Offline pwillo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • THANKS 0
  • Location: Redcliffe
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #36 on: October 20, 2017, 10:32:07 AM »
Thanks Dugite,  never would have guessed from their website.   

I want to move the handbrake lever forward of the 'C' channel cross piece and fit either a box or firewood basket or maybe a tyre at the front.

Regards
Series 2A GS bought and sold before the Internet was discovered.
Perentie FFR 51-558
Hallmark PT1-1.2 204923
Discovery for comfort!

Offline dugite

  • REMLR Committee
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 822
  • THANKS 73
  • Location: Tamworth
  • REMLR No: 374
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #37 on: October 20, 2017, 09:55:48 PM »
this is the thread ..

http://remlr.com/forum/index.php?topic=3577.0

pics lost due to photobucket carryon
2a 109 114-341,
No.5 173-589,
W/S Platform 178-000,
PT1 204-796

Offline Carzee

  • REMLR Committee
  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 2861
  • THANKS 111
  • Perentie FFR 50-257
    • RC's Shed
  • Location: Canberra
  • REMLR No: 007
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #38 on: October 21, 2017, 11:48:17 AM »
Pity about the pics Laurie -I was going to do this mod as well.

Offline dugite

  • REMLR Committee
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 822
  • THANKS 73
  • Location: Tamworth
  • REMLR No: 374
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #39 on: October 21, 2017, 12:42:14 PM »
I'll take some more and post 'em when I get back home 😊
2a 109 114-341,
No.5 173-589,
W/S Platform 178-000,
PT1 204-796

Offline craigb

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
  • THANKS 11
  • Location: NSW
  • REMLR No: 488
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #40 on: October 21, 2017, 03:06:46 PM »
I can see the pics fine.

Go here - http://remlr.com/forum/index.php?topic=5268

EDIT: Pics attached
« Last Edit: October 21, 2017, 03:10:07 PM by craigb »
ARN 49-215 Truck, Utility, Lightweight, FFR, Winch, MC2 "Frankie" -1989
ARN 101-001 Trailer, Cargo, Ton, 2 Wheeled, Aust. No. 5 - 1963

Offline dugite

  • REMLR Committee
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 822
  • THANKS 73
  • Location: Tamworth
  • REMLR No: 374
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #41 on: October 21, 2017, 08:47:12 PM »
aaa..amazing

thanks craig
2a 109 114-341,
No.5 173-589,
W/S Platform 178-000,
PT1 204-796

Offline Carzee

  • REMLR Committee
  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 2861
  • THANKS 111
  • Perentie FFR 50-257
    • RC's Shed
  • Location: Canberra
  • REMLR No: 007
Re: Haulmark PT1-1.2 and PT2-2.2 Trailers
« Reply #42 on: November 03, 2017, 10:39:55 PM »
I loaded the single axle Haulmark trailer this week with 700kg. The maximum payload is 750kg. At the supplier I was weighed on a weighbridge going in (empty) and weighed again going out, after getting loaded. Soil, gravel, sand, and compost is what they sell.

I took the photo to show how much the loaded springs move, how much the wheel travels up into the mudguard when loaded near the maximum. The movement was about 50mm.

I think that means, if you change the bodywork, if you take off the original "box" and install a full-width camper body or ATV carrier setup or something, the wheelwell needn't be half as high as the original mudguard. Or is that a wrong assumption?